Immediate or on-demand endoscopic necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis

Saito T et al, Gastroenterology. 2026;171(1):140-153
The randomized Wonder-01 trial demonstrated that immediate necrosectomy following EUS-guided drainage of walled-off necrosis reduced time to clinical success without increasing adverse outcomes, but required more endoscopic procedures as compared to on-demand necrosectomy.

Background and aims: The optimal timing for direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) after endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural drainage of symptomatic necrotizing pancreatitis remains unknown. We hypothesized that immediate DEN after EUS-guided drainage might reduce the time to disease resolution compared with a drainage-oriented step-up approach.

Methods: This study was a multicenter, open-label, superiority randomized trial (WONDER-01). Among patients who received EUS-guided treatment for symptomatic necrotizing pancreatitis, eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either immediate DEN or the drainage-oriented step-up approach. The primary endpoint was the time from randomization to clinical success, defined as a decrease in collection size to ≤3 cm and an improvement in inflammatory markers.

endoscopic_necrosectomy

Results: Seventy patients were enrolled in this study: 33 in the immediate DEN arm and 37 in the step-up arm. Immediate DEN was associated with a shorter time to clinical success than the step-up approach (p = 0.009), with median times (95% confidence interval) of 29 (19-34) and 44 (38-52) days, respectively. All patients in the immediate DEN arm received DEN compared with 46% in the step-up approach arm, but the rates of procedure-related adverse events were comparable (24% vs. 22%, respectively; p = 0.79). No significant differences were noted between the treatment arms in terms of technical success (100% vs. 97%; p > 0.99) and mortality (12% vs. 5.4%; p = 0.41).

Conclusions: Compared with the step-up approach, immediate DEN after EUS-guided drainage of necrotizing pancreatitis reduced time to clinical success without increasing adverse outcomes but required more DEN procedures.

Y. Nakai, Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo City, Tokyo, Japan, e-mail: [email protected]

DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2026.01.034