Guselkumab for the treatment of ulcerative colitis

Rubin DT et al, Lancet. 2025;405(10472):33-49
In this phase 3 study in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (QUASAR), 23% achieved clinical remission after 12 weeks of treatment with the IL-23 antibody guselkumab compared to 8% with placebo. During maintenance therapy, 50% of patients treated with guselkumab achieved clinical remission after 44 weeks.

Background: Interleukin-23 inhibition is effective in treating ulcerative colitis. Guselkumab is a dual-acting, human IgG1, interleukin-23p19 subunit inhibitor that potently neutralises interleukin-23 and can bind to CD64. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Methods: The primary populations of these 2 phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (QUASAR phase 3 induction and maintenance) included randomised and treated adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (induction baseline modified Mayo score from 5 to 9) with inadequate response or intolerance to conventional or advanced ulcerative colitis therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (3:2) to receive guselkumab 200 mg given intravenously or placebo at weeks 0, 4, and 8 (phase 3 induction study). All patients were randomly assigned using web-based interactive response technology. Patients in clinical response 12 weeks after guselkumab induction given intravenously (from QUASAR phase 2b and phase 3 induction studies) were randomly assigned (1:1:1) at maintenance week 0 to guselkumab 200 mg given subcutaneously every 4 weeks or 100 mg every 8 weeks or placebo for 44 weeks (maintenance). Primary endpoints were clinical remission at induction week 12 and maintenance week 44.

vector-elisa-immuno-assay.jpg

Findings: The induction study primary population included 701 patients (guselkumab 200 mg given intravenously 60% [421 patients]; placebo 40% [280 patients]). The maintenance study primary population included 568 guselkumab induction responders randomly assigned to receive guselkumab 200 mg given subcutaneously every 4 weeks (190 patients [33%]) or 100 mg every 8 weeks (188 patients [33%]) or placebo (guselkumab withdrawal 190 patients [33%]). A significantly greater proportion of patients treated with guselkumab given intravenously had clinical remission at induction week 12 (23% [95/421 patients]) than did placebo-treated patients (8% [22/280 patients]; adjusted treatment difference 15%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 10–20; p < 0.0001). Clinical remission at maintenance week 44 was achieved by a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with guselkumab 200 mg given subcutaneously every 4 weeks (50% [95/190 patients]; adjusted treatment difference 30%, 95% CI: 21–38; p < 0.0001) and 100 mg every 8 weeks (45% [85/188 patients]; adjusted treatment difference 25%, 95% CI: 16–34; p < 0.0001) than with placebo (19% [36/190 patients]). The overall safety profile was favourable and consistent with that of guselkumab in approved indications. In the induction study, adverse events were reported by 49% of patients in both groups (208/421 guselkumab-treated patients and 138/280 placebo-treated patients), serious adverse events were reported by 3% (12/421) of guselkumab-treated patients and 7% (20/280) of placebo-treated patients, and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were reported by 2% (7/421) of guselkumab-treated patients and 4% (11/280) of placebo-treated patients. In the maintenance study, adverse event rates were similar among groups, and the most frequently reported adverse events in all groups were ulcerative colitis, COVID-19, and arthralgia. No active tuberculosis, anaphylaxis, serum sickness, or clinically important hepatic disorders were reported in either study.

Interpretation: Guselkumab was effective and safe as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.

D.T. Rubin, University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Chicago, IL, USA,
E-Mail: [email protected]

DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)01927-5